Page 212 - Quarentena_1ed_2020
P. 212

ground under its feet; it starts to fall only when it looks down and
            notices the abyss. When it loses its authority, the regime is like a
            cat above the precipice: in order to fall, it only has to be remin-
            ded to look down… But the opposite also holds: when an autho-
            ritarian regime approaches its final crisis, its dissolution as a rule
            follows two steps. Before its actual collapse, a mysterious rupture
            takes place: all of a sudden people know that the game is over, they
            are simply no longer afraid. It is not only that the regime loses its
            legitimacy, its exercise of power itself is perceived as an impotent
            panic reaction. In Shah of Shahs, a classic account of the Khomeini
            revolution, Ryszard Kapuscinski located the precise moment of this
            rupture: at a Tehran crossroad, a single demonstrator refused to
            budge when a policeman shouted at him to move, and the embar-
            rassed policeman simply withdrew; in a couple of hours, all Tehran
            was talking about this incident, and although there were street
            fights going on for weeks, everyone somehow knew the game is
            over… There are indications that something similar could be going
            on today: all the dictatorial powers the state apparatuses are amas-
            sing just makes all the more palpable their basic impotence.
               We should resist here the temptation of celebrating this disin-
            tegration of our trust as an opening for the people to self-organize
            locally outside the state apparatuses: an efficient state which “de-
            livers” and can be at least relatively trusted is today needed more
            than ever. Self-organization of local-communities will do its work
            only in combination with the state apparatus… and with science.
            We are now forced to admit that modern science, in spite of all its
            hidden biases, is the predominant form of trans-cultural universa-
            lity. The epidemics provides a welcome opportunity for science to
            assert itself in this role.
               Here, however, a new problem arises: in science also, there is
            no big Other, no subject on whom we can fully rely, who is un-
            questionably presumed to know. There are different conclusions, as
            well as different proposals about what to do, advocated by serious



            212
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217